Trust & safety

A community worth
protecting.

Earthback is designed around genuine commitments and the people who make them. Here's how trust is built, how the community stays healthy, and what it means to build with intention and reciprocity.

Intentional
and reciprocal.

This is the shared commitment. It's not a checklist of approved activities or a litmus test. It's a question: does what you're doing give something back?

If you're working on something that improves the land, the community, or the future — there's a place for you here. Whether you're building, learning, teaching, organizing, or just figuring out where to start.

Not a rulebook.
A shared commitment.

Earthback doesn't have a 47-page terms of service written by lawyers to protect the platform. It has a Core Constitution written by the community to protect the people in it — and a shared standard that everyone who joins agrees to uphold.

The standard is intentionally human and intentionally high. Someone building a straw-bale home, organizing a food forest, running a mutual aid network, stewarding a shared water system — or someone who just found out these things exist and wants to learn more. Everyone here shares an orientation toward the collective good.

The community self-governs in the way that any good community does: by holding its members accountable, by maintaining honest records of what was committed and what was delivered, and by having clear expectations about what happens when someone falls short.

The platform is a tool. The community is what makes it work.

Earned, not assumed

Trust in Earthback is built the same way it's built in any real community: through repeated interaction, fulfilled commitments, and the honest record that accumulates over time.

Track record

Every commitment you make — time, skills, resources — is recorded. Every commitment you keep adds to your track record. Every commitment you miss, with no explanation, also stays on the record. Future project members can see who shows up.

This isn't punitive. Life happens and commitments fall through. But honesty matters. If you can't make it, say so early. If something went wrong, say why. The record is honest, not ruthless.

Vouching

Within a circle, members can vouch for each other — an explicit signal that says "I've worked with this person and I'd work with them again." Vouches are public and carry weight.

A vouch is a form of accountability for the voucher as well as the vouched. If someone you've vouched for behaves badly, that matters. The social accountability is intentional.

Verified actions

Certain types of activity can be verified by other project members — attendance at a build day, delivery of materials, completion of a task. Verified actions are distinct from self-reported ones and carry additional weight in your profile.

As the platform matures, reputation from verified activity becomes the primary trust signal in the network — more than any identity check or self-description.

What the community
expects of everyone

These aren't rules invented by the platform. They're the expectations that naturally emerge from a community of people trying to do something real together. The platform makes them explicit so there's no ambiguity.

Be specific about what you're committing to. "I'll help" isn't a commitment. "I'll bring my transit level and 6 hours of labor on March 8" is. The difference matters — to the project and to the people depending on you.

Communicate early when something changes. Dropping out of a commitment is sometimes unavoidable. Disappearing without notice is not acceptable. Give the group time to adjust. The earlier you communicate, the less it costs everyone.

Be honest about your skills and resources. Don't claim expertise you don't have, or resources you can't actually provide. A project that's counting on your contribution can't easily replace it at the last minute.

Keep what you learn in the circle. Circles are spaces where people share real information — techniques, resources, failures, lessons learned. That information belongs to the circle. It's not for sharing outside it without consent.

Engage in good faith. Disagreements happen. Disputes over how a project is going are normal. Work through them within the project or circle. Don't take disputes public in ways that harm other members.

What's welcome here
Natural building, earthen construction, hemp-lime, straw bale, cob
Solar, wind, off-grid energy systems, group energy purchases
Water systems — greywater, rainwater, irrigation, shared infrastructure
Permaculture, food forests, community gardens, food co-ops
Mutual aid, resource sharing, neighborhood resilience
Community land trusts, shared housing, cooperative stewardship
What the community watches for
Commercial activity that doesn't serve the community
Content that disrupts productive collaboration
Exploitative project structures or bad-faith participation
Misrepresentation of skills, resources, or intentions
Harassment, discrimination, or bad-faith engagement

Moderation that's
proportionate and transparent.

Moderation in Earthback is not automated or algorithmic. It's a human process, handled by circle moderators and the platform's community stewards, with graduated responses and a clear path to resolution.

1
Report
Any member can report a concern — about a commitment missed without communication, a member acting in bad faith, or a post or project that doesn't belong in the community. Reports are reviewed by circle moderators, not by an algorithm.
2
Review
Circle moderators review the report and reach out to all parties involved. The goal at this stage is understanding, not punishment. Most issues are resolved through conversation — an explanation, an apology, a commitment to do differently.
3
Graduated response
When conversation doesn't resolve the issue, moderators apply a graduated response: a warning that stays on record, a temporary restriction on new commitments or project creation, a suspension from the circle, or — in serious cases — removal from the platform. The response matches the severity and pattern of behavior.
4
Appeal
Any moderation decision can be appealed to the platform's community stewards. Appeals are reviewed by people who weren't involved in the original decision. The outcome of the appeal is final and recorded in the platform's moderation log, which is accessible to community members.
5
Transparency
Earthback publishes aggregated moderation statistics periodically — number of reports, types of issues, outcomes. No individual member data is disclosed, but the community can see how moderation is being applied. Accountability goes both ways.

What's shared,
what stays with you

Earthback collects the minimum data needed to make the platform work. Here's what you share with whom, and what stays private.

Visible to your circles

Your name or display name, your circle memberships, your public posts and project activity, your commitment track record (what you committed, what you delivered), and vouches you've given or received.

Circle-visible

Visible only within projects

The details of your specific commitments (when, what, how much), task assignments, and any contact information you choose to share with a project group. Project members can see this; your broader circles cannot.

Project-only

Private to you

Your email address, your location beyond what you choose to share (e.g., "Taos NM" is voluntary), any direct messages, draft posts and projects you haven't published. This data is never shared with other members.

Always private

Never sold or shared

Earthback does not sell your data. It does not share your data with advertisers, data brokers, or third parties for marketing purposes. Ever. This is a constitutional commitment, not a policy that can be quietly updated.

Never sold

A place worth building
together.

Earthback is open and free. If this sounds like the community you've been looking for, come on in.

Free · Takes two minutes · No spam